The Supreme Court has given a 5-4 ruling that stops Michigan from suing to block a casino that is off-reservation. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
The guidelines governing casinos run by Native American tribal groups are varied and complex, counting on both federal laws and the compacts signed between states and the tribes that reside within them. This plays out in legal battles over the country, including one which was simply settled in the highest court associated with land.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled this week that Michigan cannot sue a tribe to stop the opening and operation of A indian casino, as tribal sovereign immunity overrules the state’s legal challenges. Your decision was a divisive one, as the justices had been split 5-4 in support of the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Off-Reservation Casino in mind of Case
The situation revolved around a casino that the Bay Mills tribe built in 2010 about 90 miles south of its booking, that will be positioned on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The tribe had purchased land there with money it received as part of money with the federal government over allegations they gave up in 19th century treaties that they had not been properly compensated for land.
As the casino was built on off-reservation land, Michigan had argued that its operation was in violation of these state compact and without permission from the state or federal governments.
But in writing the majo Read more…